<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squitters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everwas.com/2007/09/squitters.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everwas.com/2007/09/squitters.html</link>
	<description>Ian Kennedy&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Wilsey</title>
		<link>http://everwas.com/2007/09/squitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-3969</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Wilsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everwas.com/2007/09/squitters.html#comment-3969</guid>
		<description>I love twitter-based words - always funny to say! Having said that, in the official terms of use, Twitter states that they reserve the right to reclaim usernames for those that officially own the trademark to the name.     So in essence, nobody can really hold &quot;hostage&quot; a brand-name username. Ex: Nintendo is currently being squatted upon - but if the &quot;Big N&quot; wanted to use Twitter as a PR stunt, they could easily take it back.    Which is good. I&#039;d hate to have to see some stupid fiasco come out of this. ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love twitter-based words &#8211; always funny to say! Having said that, in the official terms of use, Twitter states that they reserve the right to reclaim usernames for those that officially own the trademark to the name.     So in essence, nobody can really hold &amp;quot;hostage&amp;quot; a brand-name username. Ex: Nintendo is currently being squatted upon &#8211; but if the &amp;quot;Big N&amp;quot; wanted to use Twitter as a PR stunt, they could easily take it back.    Which is good. I&#39;d hate to have to see some stupid fiasco come out of this. ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

